检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东医学院附属医院眼科,广东省湛江市524001
出 处:《眼科新进展》2015年第2期177-179,共3页Recent Advances in Ophthalmology
摘 要:目的探讨不同类型青光眼患者前部巩膜厚度(anterior sclera thickness,AST)与眼部生物学参数的相关性。方法选取2012年1月至2013年6月我院收治的青光眼患者80例(80眼),其中原发性闭角型青光眼(primary angle-closure glaucoma,PACG)38例,原发性开角型青光眼(primary open angle glaucoma,POAG)42例,另选取于我院同期健康体检的健康无眼疾者40例(40眼)作为对照,采用超声生物显微镜(ultrasound biomicroscopy,UBM)对AST进行检测,DGH-1000型超声角膜测厚仪测量中央角膜厚度(central corneal thickness,CCT),同时采用眼科A/B超对眼轴长度(axial length,AL)进行测量,对测量结果进行比较分析。结果 POAG组、PACG组AST与对照组相比,差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05);POAG组AST与PACG组相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。POAG组、PACG组CCT与对照组相比,差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05),POAG组、PACG组CCT均大于对照组;POAG组CCT与PACG组相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),POAG组CCT大于PACG组。POAG组、PACG组AL与对照组相比,差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05),POAG组、PACG组AL均小于对照组;POAG组AL与PACG组相比,差异有统计学意义(P>0.05),POAG组AL小于PACG组。POAG组CCT值与AST值间呈线性正相关(r=0.544,P=0.018),但PACG组CCT值与AST值间均未发现线性相关(r=-12.345,P=0.058);两组AL与AST均无相关性。结论不同类型青光眼患者的CCT有一定的差异,但各型青光眼患者AST无明显差异,POAG患者的CCT与AST可能存在一定的正相关。Objective To discuss the correlation between anterior sclera thick- ness (AST) and other ocular biological parameters in patients with different types of glaucoma. Methods Eighty patients ( 80 eyes) with different types of glaucoma in our hospital form January 2012 to June 2013 were enrolled,including 38 cases with primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) and 42 cases with primary open-angle glaucoma ( PO- AG), and other 40 healthy cases (40 eyes)were chosen as controls, the AST was detec- ted by ultrasound biomicroscopy,the central corneal thickness (CCT)was measured by DGH-1000 corneal ultrasound pachymeter,and the axis length (AL)was also measured by A/B ultrasound, the results were compared and analyzed. Results There was no statistical difference in AST between PACG group, POAG group and control group ( all P 〉 0.05 ), no difference was found between POAG group and PCAG group (P 〉 0.05 ), but there were statistical differences in CCT between PACG group, POAG group and control group ( all P 〈 0.05 ), and there was statistical difference in CCT between PACG group and POAG group (P 〈 0.05 ). There were statistical differences in AL between PACG group, POAG group and control group ( all P 〈 0.05 ), and there was statistical difference between PACG group and POAG group (P 〈 0.05 ). In POAG group, CCT and AST value showed a linear positive correlation( r = 0. 544 ,P = 0. 018 ), but in the PACG group CCT value and AST value are not linear correlation (r = - 12.345 ,P = 0.058). AL and AST of two groups had no correlation. Conclusion In patients with different types of glau- coma, CCT have some differences, but no significant difference in AST, CCT and AST in patients with POAG may be positive correlated.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222