实现担保物权非讼许可裁定的文本分析——基于北京、重庆、广东三地法院的考察  

Textual Analysis of Ruling of Realizing Real Right for Security's Noncontentious Proceedings

作　　者：毋爱斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2014年第5期181-189,共9页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目(13CFX050):"司法规则制定权的基本理论与制度构建研究";司法部国家法治与法学理论研究课题一般项目(12SFB2027):"案外人救济制度研究"

摘　　要：《民事诉讼法》中新增的实现担保物权非讼程序,目的是在程序主体对主债权、担保物权等实体问题不存在争执的基础上做出许可执行拍卖、变卖裁定。而通过对北京、重庆、广东三地法院做出的许可裁定书文本分析得知,法院对优先权、优先受偿数额等相关实体问题是否在裁定书中做出处理的态度大相径庭。从认识归因上讲,主要是对形式审查原则认识不清。对此,从法理解释来看,许可裁定书不仅要对担保财产"是否"以及"如何"拍卖、变卖做出裁断,还应对优先受偿数额等实体问题进行确认。该裁定性质上为"对物的执行名义",具有执行力。Civil Procedures Act（ 2012） establishes Realizing Real Right For Security’s Noncontentious Proceedings. The purpose of this proceedings is to obtain permitting the implementation of the auction ruling. But on the analysis of the permitting the implementation of the auction ruling,we find the judges have different viewpoints to the substance of the dispute. The reason is the judges don’t accurately understand the principle of the formal examination. On the interpretative theory,the program should be in the principle of the formal examination. Meanwhile,permitting the implementation of the auction ruling is enforcement basis for objects. If the parts yield the essential issues,they should resolve the issues through the litigation procedure.

关 键 词：担保物权 非讼许可裁定 形式审查原则 对物的执行名义 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学]