非法证据在庭前会议中的排除方式研究  

Research on the Processing of Excluding Illegal Evidence in the Pretrial Conference

作　　者：陈子楠[1] 杨宇冠[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院 [2]中国政法大学诉讼法研究学院

出　　处：《南京社会科学》2015年第3期108-111,120,共5页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目"非法证据排除规则在中国的实施问题研究"(11JJD820016)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：2013年1月施行的《刑事诉讼法》中增加了庭前会议程序,其中对于非法证据排除的相关内容引起了法学理论界和司法实务部门的广泛关注,对庭前会议司法实践的实证研究表明庭前会议程序本身还存在法规模糊、制度欠缺等问题,其中对于非法证据的处理更是争议的焦点。本文系统分析了我国现行法律法规体系中有关庭前会议中非法证据排除的相关条款,考察了司法实践情况以及法学理论界的不同观点,从我国当前刑事司法体系发展阶段及特点出发,提出除控辩双方争议较大的情况以外,非法证据排除问题原则上应当在庭前会议中解决,同时法律法规应明确庭前会议中非法证据排除决定的效力。The pretrial conference was provided in the newly revised Criminal Procedure Law in January,2013,in which the content about exclusion of illegal evidence has aroused widespread concerns among legal theory and judicial practice departments. An empirical research on the practice of pretrial conference shows that there are drawbacks in the provisions and legal system,including the handling of illegal evidence which is the focus of controversy. Based on the systematic analysis of China＇s current laws and regulations relating to the exclusion of illegal evidence in pretrial conference and studying of different perspectives of practice and theory,it is proposed in the paper that,except for that the prosecution and defense has a large controversy,the issue of exclusion of illegal evidence should be resolved at the pretrial conference,and the legal effects of decision of pretrial conference on exclusion of illegal evidence should be made more clear.

关 键 词：庭前会议 非法证据排除 排除方式 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]