论商标争议行政诉讼的举证责任  

Study on the Burden of Proof of Trademark Disputes in Administrative Litigation

作　　者：李海炅[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国计量学院法学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2015年第3期37-40,共4页Intellectual Property

摘　　要：商标争议行政诉讼的举证责任可以因当事人提交新的证据、法院依职权取证等情形引起的举证范围的改变而发生根本性变化,这容易导致司法权与行政权的混淆、原告的利益受到侵害、法院的裁量权失去约束,从而影响司法公正。为维护司法权威,平衡各方利益,法院对待商标争议举证责任,应恪守"以法律审为原则,以事实审为例外"。The burden of proof of trademark disputes in administrative litigation will be fundamentally changed as a result of the change of the scope of evidence which is due to the submission of new evidence by the parties or obtention of evidence by the court ex officio, etc. These changes may influence judicatory fairness, in the form of confusion of jurisdiction and administrative power, interest assault of the plaintiff and lack of restriction of judicial discretion. The courts should work on the principle of legal review and the exception of factual review in order to maintain judicature authority and balance the interests of all parties.

关 键 词：商标争议 行政诉讼 举证责任 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学] D923.43[政治法律—法学]