行政合同司法审查现状审视与现实路径分析  

Status Survey and Actual Path Analysis of Judicial Review of Administrative Contract

作　　者：陈茂春[1] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学,黑龙江哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《行政与法》2015年第2期93-99,共7页Administration and Law

摘　　要：现行《行政诉讼法》修改后,虽能解决行政合同纠纷进入行政诉讼程序的法律问题,但对于建构系统的行政合同司法审查制度仍缺乏针对性。因此,应具体考察行政合同立法现状与司法实践,补充设立单独的行政合同司法审查规则。本文认为,要明确行政合同纠纷必须以准用私法的公法模式予以解决,同时应建立双向性诉讼结构,逐步完善行政主体原告资格、举证责任分配、调解原则、审查原则、判决形式的制度规则。The modification of the Administrative Procedure Law can solve some legal problems initiated by administrative contractdisputes entering the administrative litigation procedure,but it lacks pertinence for constructing the systematic judicial reviewsystem of administrative contract.Therefore,we shall specifically study the legislation status of administrative contract and the exploration and attitudes towards judicial practices,and supplement the establishment of the separate judicial review rules of administrative contract.The specific path shall be as follow ：first,we shall make it definite that administrative contract disputes shall be applicable to the public law mode of private law for solution;second,we shall set up the bidirectional litigation structure,and construct the systematic rules of the plaintiff qualifications ofadministrative subjects concerned,allocation of burden of proof,arbitration principles,checkup principles and judgment forms.

关 键 词：行政合同 诉讼客体 诉讼结构 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]