情境语义学能否替代可能世界语义学  

Can Situation Semantics replace Possible-word Semantics

作　　者：张文彦[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学哲学系,北京100871

出　　处：《长江大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第1期78-80,共3页Journal of Yangtze University（Social Sciences Edition）

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目(12&ZD119)

摘　　要：情境语义学者认为,可能世界语义学含有语义整体论这一哲学预设,不符合人类认知的实际状态,而且形式语义学把真值当作意义,并不能代表意义的全部内容。因此,他们希望能创建一种新的情境语义理论,以替代可能世界语义学。但从两种语义理论各自最基本的概念和研究方法及现有成果的比较中,我们可以得出这一结论:情境语义学不能替代可能世界语义学。The researcher who prefer situation semantics believes that the possible-word semantics,which is the foundation of formal semantics,presuppose semantic holism,and that＇s not the natural way people knowing world.Formal semantics consider the truth value as the sentences＇ meaning,which obviously can＇t represent the whole meaning.They want to build a new situation semantic theory to replace the possible-word semantics.We start with the basic conceptions,and compare the two theories in researching methods and the late results.Then we conclude that there is no way for situation semantics to replace possible-world semantics.

关 键 词：可能世界语义学 情境语义学 模型论 形式化 自然语言处理 

分 类 号：B815.1[哲学宗教—逻辑学]