检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏敏[1]
出 处:《辽宁警专学报》2015年第2期33-36,共4页Journal of Liaoning Police Academy
摘 要:美国社会执法实践中广泛存在诱惑侦查的使用,关于诱惑侦查的法律和制度规制经过长期演变和经验积累,形成了较为完整的诱惑侦查制度。本文通过对美国诱惑侦查制度的法律规定和具体实践的探究,以期为完善公安机关执法工作提供一些参考。我们应借鉴美国关于诱惑侦查方式运用的有益经验,加快有关诱惑侦查领域的立法进程,明确具体的法律规定。公安机关在执法实践中应正确认识诱惑侦查的合理性,慎用诱惑侦查手段,严格遵循程序执法,规范自身执法行为,积极改进执法方式。The temptation investigation is widely used by American police in the practice of law enforcement. The law and the regulation about the temptation investigation has formed a relatively complete system and experience after a long evolution. By exploring the legal provisions on America enticement investigation system and specific practice, this paper aims to provide some reference for perfecting the law enforcement of public security organs. We should draw lessons from the United States about the beneficial experience of using temptation investigation, speed up the legislative process in the field of the temptation investigation, and clear the specific legal provisions. The public security organs should understand the rationality of the temptation investigation correctly, use means of temptation investigation cautiously, follow the law enforcement procedure strictly, standardize practice of law enforcement, and improve the way of law enforcement actively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70