象征资本的争夺和博弈——关于《青春之歌》的论争和修改兼论集体写作  

Dispute and Game of Symbolic Capital: Debate and Revision of and Collective Writing

作　　者：孙莹[1] 周扬[2] 

机构地区：[1]嘉兴学院南湖学院中文系,浙江嘉兴314001 [2]上海师范大学人文学院,上海200030

出　　处：《石河子大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第1期88-94,共7页Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：《青春之歌》是社会主义文学实践的代表性作品之一,在出版之初就引起了一场大规模的论争,从工人到党的文艺官员都以不同方式介入了这场论争。论争一方面体现了不同文学观点之间的碰撞,另一方面也体现了象征资本的争夺和博弈。论争的结果是《青春之歌》的修改、再版和影响的进一步扩大。从论争到修改,《青春之歌》完成了"集体写作"的过程。这一方式是社会主义文学实践和意识形态再生产中的一个独特现象。Song of Youth is one of the representative works of socialist literary practice. In the beginning of the publication, it sparked a widespread controversy, in which people from workers to the Party’s literary officials were involved in the debate in different ways. On the one hand, it was a collision of different literary points of view; on the other hand, it was a dispute and game of symbolic capital. The result of the debat led to a revision and republication of the novel,which loomed large its publicity. From the debate to negotiated the process of “collective writing”, which is a unique phenomen in socialist literaray practice and ideology reproduction.

关 键 词：《青春之歌》 修改 集体写作 

分 类 号：I207.42[文学—中国文学]