检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]牡丹江医学院红旗医院,黑龙江牡丹江157011 [2]牡丹江医学院病理教研室
出 处:《腹腔镜外科杂志》2015年第1期18-20,共3页Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
摘 要:目的:探讨远端胃癌腹腔镜D2根治术的近期疗效及手术安全性。方法:选择2012年6月至2013年9月43例行胃癌D2根治术的远端胃癌患者,根据手术方式分为腹腔镜组(n=18)与开腹组(n=25)。对比两组患者术中及术后恢复情况、近期疗效及并发症等。结果:两组患者手术时间、淋巴结清除数量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);腹腔镜组术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间及并发症发生率明显优于开腹组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);结论:与开放手术相比,腹腔镜远端胃癌D2根治术具有患者创伤小、康复快、出血少等优点,手术疗效及安全性可靠。Objective: To investigate the short-term therapy efficacy and safety of laparoscopic D2 radical operation for distal gastric cancer. Methods: From Jun. 2012 to Sep. 2013,43 patients receiving D2 radical operation for distal gastric cancer were divided into laparoscopic group( n = 18) and open surgery group( n = 25). Intraoperative and postoperative recovery,short-term therapy effects and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in operation time and the number of lymph node dissection between the two groups( P〉0. 05). Intraoperative bleeding volume,postoperative anal exhaust time and complication incidence in laparoscopic group were significantly better than those in open surgery group( P〈0. 05). Conclusions: Compared with open surgery,laparoscopic D2 radical operation for distal gastric cancer has advantages of minimal invasion,rapid recovery,little blood loss,reliable efficacy and safety.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145