检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵路平[1]
出 处:《世界睡眠医学杂志》2014年第5期284-286,共3页World Journal of Sleep Medicine
摘 要:目的比较瑞波西汀与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症的疗效和安全性。方法将84例抑郁症患者按照随机数字表随机分为2组各42例,瑞波西汀组给予瑞波西汀,初始剂量4 mg/d,2周内渐增至12 mg/d;帕罗西汀组给予帕罗西汀,初始剂量20 mg/d,2周内渐增至50 mg/d,疗程均为6周。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评定临床疗效,不良反应量表(TESS)评定不良反应。结果瑞波西汀组有效率为88.0%、显效率为76.1%;帕罗西汀组有效率为90.4%、显效率为78.5%,2组显效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论瑞波西汀与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症均有疗,依从性好,且瑞波西汀起效较帕罗西汀快。Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of of reboxetine vs. paroxet ine in the treatment of depression. Methods 84 patients w ere randomly divided into reboxe tine( n = 42) and paroxetine( n = 42) group for 6 weeks.The efficacy and side effects w ere assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale( HAM D) and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale( TESS),respectively. Results The total efficiency in reboxetine group and paroxetineinthe group were 88.0% and 90.4% respectively,and no significant difference between two groups( P 0.05). Conclusion Both reboxetine and paroxetine have evident effects,higher safety and better compliance in the treatment of depression,but the former shows a faster effect.
分 类 号:R749.4[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170