案例指导制度下的法律解释及其规则——以最高人民法院发布的“指导案例11号”为例  

Legal Interpretation and Rules in the Case Guidance System——For the Supreme People's court “guiding case No.11”

作　　者：张传新[1] 邱成梁[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学威海校区,山东威海264209

出　　处：《北京警察学院学报》2014年第2期14-20,共7页Journal of Beijing Police College

基　　金：博士后基金项目"融合逻辑与经验的法律论辩模型研究"(项目编号:2012M511470)的阶段性成果;山东大学科研创新基金项目"维特根斯坦与法律理论"阶段性成果

摘　　要：指导性案例对法律解释提出了四项基本要求:一是有法律解释的内容;二是解释合乎法律本意;三是对案件中法律问题的解释有所创新;四是法律解释方法应合理运用。法律解释规则的融贯运用,是满足指导性案例要求的基本的、合理的路径。法律解释规则的融贯运用,宏观上是各种法律解释规则运用的排序与整合,微观上是各种法律解释规则的具体细化运用。在杨延虎等贪污案中,首先运用了文义解释规则,在特殊情况下充分运用了扩张解释规则、体系解释规则以及目的解释规则,实现了法律效果与政治效果、社会效果的统一。Guiding cases put forward four basic requirements on legal interpretation：the first is the legal interpretation of the content;the second is that the interpretation accords with the legal intention;the third is the innovative interpretation of legal issues in the case;the fourth is that legal interpretation methods should be reasonable.The application of the legal interpretation rules is the basic,reasonable way that the guiding cases meet the requirements.The coherent application is that the rank and integration of the legal interpretation rules at the macro level,and the specific and detailed application of the rules of legal interpretation at the micro level.In the ＂Yang Yanhu corruption case＂,it uses the literal interpretation rules,and makes full use of extensive interpretation rules,teleological interpretation rules and systematical interpretation methods in special circumstances,consequently realizing the unity of legal effect,political effect and social effect.

关 键 词：指导案例 法律解释规则 扩张解释 体系解释 目的解释 

分 类 号：D911.05[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]