精神利益保护决定民事责任法不可替代  

Protecting Mental Interests Making the Civil Liability Law Irreplaceable

作　　者：方乐坤[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《西华大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第2期78-84,共7页Journal of Xihua University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)

基　　金：2010年度教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"民事责任体系的人文改良--以人的精神利益维护的进路"(项目批准号:10YJC820027)

摘　　要：随着现代社会保障体系的建立,民事责任法面临着存在必要性的质疑,从而似乎罹于一场空前的"生存危机"。然而,现代社会保障体系不能解决人的精神利益保护问题。精神利益保护决定民事责任法具有不可替代性。民事责任法以其道德本性为存在依据;背离道德原则对民事责任法进行解释的理论均有成立障碍;现代社会救济立法理论和实践均难以否定民事责任追偿机制及其固有功能。With the modern social security system being established, the civil liability law has been questioned for its necessity of existence, and thereby suffered from an unparalleled ＂survival crisis＂ seemingly. However, the modern social security system cannot resolve the problem of people＇ s mental interests protecting. Mental interests protecting makes the civil liability law ilTeplaceable, The civil liability law lies in its morality nature; any theory could not justify itself when it interprets civil liability law against morality principle; both the modern social remedy theory and its practice are not able to deny civil liability law＇ s repaying mechanism and its inherent function.

关 键 词：精神利益保护 民事责任法 不可替代性 

分 类 号：DF526[政治法律—民商法学]