检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:窦一杰[1]
机构地区:[1]东北财经大学产业组织与企业组织研究中心,辽宁大连116025
出 处:《运筹与管理》2015年第1期149-156,共8页Operations Research and Management Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71302057);辽宁省教育厅科学研究一般项目(W2012165);辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目(L12BJY019);东北财经大学2014年优秀科研创新人才项目(DUFE2014R18);东北财经大学产业经济学特色重点学科资助项目
摘 要:考虑消费者产品安全偏好和产品安全水平等因素,针对采取不同产品安全战略的两个寡头制造商,建立了两阶段博弈模型:第一阶段为两制造商选择各自的产品安全度水平,第二阶段为两产品制造商确定各自的产品价格。通过数值仿真重点讨论了消费者产品安全偏好支付系数和产品安全市场准入值两参数变化带来的影响。结果表明:消费者安全偏好支付系数提高时,两制造商利润均增加;产品安全准入值提高时,低价战略采取者的利润下降;主动安全战略采取者利润增加。所得结论对于产品安全管理中政府及不同类型制造商的决策具有参考价值和指导意义。By considering multi-facet factors of consumer preference and product safety level , this paper establi-shes a duopoly two-stage game model with two players owning two different food safety strategies .The first stage is that duopoly producers choose product safety level .The second stage is that duopoly producers determine the products’ price.Further more, a numerical case is presented to discuss the effect of consumer preference and product safety market entrance level .Two results are finally acquired .Firstly, as consumer preference payment coefficient increases , the profit of the two producers with different food safety strategies would increase .Second-ly, as the product safety market entrance level increases , the profit of the proactive producer focusing on positive food safety strategy would increase whilst the profit of the reactive producer centering upon low -price strategy would decrease .The managerial implications are also discussed .The result may provide viable suggestions for the decision making of producers and government .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.24.174