社会史理念的兴起、流变与展望  

A Review on the Rise, Change and Future of the Concept of Social History

作　　者：庞慧[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学历史文化学院,陕西西安710119

出　　处：《廊坊师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2015年第1期40-45,共6页Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：社会史,即以"社会"而非个人为关注对象的历史研究取向,是近代史学与传统史学之间最显著的区别。19世纪末20世纪初以历史学与社会学的结合为特征的新史学运动,标志着社会史理念的成熟。马克思主义史学与年鉴学派的历史研究实践则使社会史研究成为20世纪史学主流,但在20世纪60年代以后,社会史理念受到广泛质疑和挑战。从社会史研究的兴起与流变历程来看,虽然社会史研究致力于将历史学社会科学化,但对理论的过分热衷在一定程度上损害了对事实的研究,这正是社会史理念遭到挑战的内在原因。社会史研究要赢得长久的尊重,应该将事实,而不是理论,摆在问题的中心。The social history orientation that historians focus their attention on society instead of individual is the most significant dif- ference between the modern history of science and traditional historiography. The new history movement which occurred in the late 19th century and early 20th century indicated that the idea of social history had already matured. Driven by the Marxism history and the annals school, social history had gradually become the mainstream of historiography in the 20th century, but it has been questioned and challenged from the 1960s. A macroscopically review on the rise and change of social history showed that, although under the flag of social history, historians had striven hard to make historiography a social science, but too much keenness for social theory has undermined the study of the facts. That is just the internal reason for the challenge to the concept of social history. To gain constant re- spect, social history should put facts, rather than theory, in the center of research.

关 键 词：社会史 历史学的科学化 新史学 20世纪史学 

分 类 号：K09[历史地理—历史学]