风险理念在国际海事组织框架下的地位和影响  

The Status and Influence of Risk Philosophy in the Framework of IMO

作　　者：张爽[1] 肖仲明[2] 王莉[3] 刘祯祺[3] 吴春平[3] 

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学国际海事公约研究中心,辽宁大连116026 [2]大连海事大学航海学院,辽宁大连116026 [3]上海船舶工艺研究所,上海200032

出　　处：《造船技术》2015年第1期1-3,48,共4页

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(项目编号:3132014310)

摘　　要：综合安全评估(FSA)、目标型新船建造标准(BGS)、安全水平法(SLA)等有关风险的议题是国际海事组织(IMO)近些年来的热点。为了给这些议题的国际谈判和有关研究工作提供一个系统、完整的背景,同时为通盘制定有关谈判策略和部署研究力量提供参考。文章对IMO框架下风险理念的发展脉络进行了梳理,指出其在不同发展阶段的地位和作用;结合欧盟、日本等基本利益诉求及其在多年谈判中的立场和主张,剖析发达国家推进应用风险理念的动因和战略布局,从而构建了IMO框架下风险理念的宏观视图,并以此为基础为我国下一步的应对工作提出了建议。Risk-related issues such as Formal Safety Assessment （FSA）, Goal-based New Ship Construction Standards （GBS） and Safety Level Approach （SLA）, have been intensively discussed in the IMO for years. To provide a consolidated background for those correlated issues, the three-phased roadmap of the development of the Risk-based Philosophy in the framework of IMO has been revealed, in conjunction with the different roles and impacts thereof for each phase. Furthermore, the propulsion and the strategic plan of the developed parties to promote the Risk-based Philosophy in the framework of the IMO have been deduced based on their principal interests and common positions in the discussions, which contribute to establish a panorama for those issues as a whole. With the purpose to facilitate the decision making and research work in the specific area, some suggestions have been provided.

关 键 词：风险 综合安全评估 目标型新船建造标准 安全水平法 影响 国际海事组织 

分 类 号：U676[交通运输工程—船舶及航道工程]