检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:武庆荣[1,2]
机构地区:[1]南京大学哲学系 [2]淮阴师范学院
出 处:《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2015年第2期20-26,共7页Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
基 金:中国博士后科学基金第55批面上资助项目(2014M551573);国家社科基金重点项目(12AZX009);国家社科基金重点项目(12AZD073)
摘 要:传统的语义理论如指称论、观念论、使用论等,分别从指称、观念、使用等角度对意义问题进行了深入的探讨,它们各自含有或多或少合理的因素,但也带有或大或小的片面性。与以上探究进路不同,美国当代著名哲学家布兰顿以推理为切入点彰显了对意义问题的不同理解,一定程度上实现了意义问题研究的范式转换。值得深思的是,由于过分强调概念推论实践的中心地位,在某种程度上,也致使他无法真正地将逻辑的形式主义纳入其理论考量。The traditional semantic theories such as the Referential Theory, the Ideational Theory and the Use Theory explored the meaning problem from points of view of reference, idea and use in depth, and each of which contained more or less reasonable factors but big or small one-sidedness. In contrast, Brandom, a famous philosopher of contemporary United States demonstrated the different understanding of the meaning problem from the perspec- tive of inference. Brandom's inferential approach, to a certain extent, achieved a paradigm shift of researches of the meaning problem. However, to some extent, because of too much emphasis on the center position of discursive practice of concepts, he could not actually in- corporate the logical formalism into his theoretical considerations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.82.179