从注释性经学到观念性哲学——20世纪《论语》诠释特点及其走向  

From the Confucian Classics to the Philosophical Style——The features and trend of the annotation of the“Analects of Confucius”in twentieth Century

作　　者：徐庆文[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学儒学高等研究院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《齐鲁学刊》2015年第1期5-9,共5页Qilu Journal

摘　　要：20世纪《论语》诠释成果分为新、古两种诠释体例,一种是以经解经式的"古"式《论语》诠释;一种是学科分治式的新式《论语》诠释。新式《论语》诠释按照文、史、哲三个学科划分出文学式的《论语》诠释、史学式的《论语》诠释、观念性的《论语》诠释三种不同风格。随着现代社会发展的深入,以经解经的古代治经方式被现代学人归入历史中。与之相对应,新式《论语》诠释模式已经成型。《论语》诠释在学科分治中,形成了文、史、哲三个学科的学者各自独立地固守着自己的领地,而拒斥其他学科的趋势。所以,现代学人不应再纠缠于恢复经学传统诠释《论语》,而是将文学层面、史学层面、哲学层面视为逻辑递进式关系,进一步推动《论语》诠释的现代发展。In twentieth Century,there were two types of the annotation of the＂Analects of Confucius＂.One is the traditional Confucian classics way and the other one is the modern academic methods under the subject division.The modern academic methods to interpret the＂Analects of Confucius＂were divided into literature,historical and philosophical style under the modern subject division.With the development of modern society,the way coming from the Confucian classics to interpret the＂Analects of Confucius＂has become history.Correspondingly,the modern academic methods to interpret the＂Analects of Confucius＂has been formed.Under the subject division,the scholars of literature,history and philosophy have their exclusive research fields.Therefore,modern scholars should not dwell on the restoration of the traditional Confucius classics interpretation of the＂Analects of Confucius＂,they should regard the three annotation styles as a logical progressive relationship to promote research of the annotation of the＂Analects of Confucius＂.

关 键 词：20世纪 《论语》诠释 注释性经学 观念性哲学 

分 类 号：B222.1[哲学宗教—中国哲学] B261