检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津市口腔医院牙体牙髓科,300014 [2]南开大学医学院人体解剖学教研室
出 处:《实用口腔医学杂志》2015年第2期241-244,共4页Journal of Practical Stomatology
摘 要:目的:研究不同超声倒预备工作尖对尸体牙根尖倒预备的效果。方法:34颗双侧同名尸体前牙,暴露根尖约3 mm,常规开髓,根管预备、冲洗、热牙胶充填后,沿垂直牙体长轴方向切除根尖3 mm。按照配对原则分为2个实验组(n=15)和1个对照组(n=4)。实验组分别采用金刚砂和不锈钢2种不同超声工作尖进行倒预备,深度3 mm,对照组不做倒预备。扫描电镜下观察根尖断面微裂、边缘完整性以及牙胶清除情况。结果:金刚砂工作尖组微裂数量较不锈钢工作尖组少(P=0.059),对根尖破坏范围小(P=0.269),牙胶去除能力前者优于后者(P=0.006)。结论:金刚砂工作尖进行根尖倒预备效果较好。Objective: To evaluate the effects of different ultrasonic retroprep tips on the root-end preparation in cadavers. Methods: 34 anterior teeth in situ in maxillary and mandibular jaws in cadavers were chosen and the root-end of 3 mm of all teeth was exposed. Root canal was prepared and filled with gutta- purcha in all teeth, 3 mm of the root end was cut off. The teeth were divided into 2 treat- ment groups( n = 15 ), and 1 control group( n =4). The root-end preparation was made using ultrasonic diamond tip and stainless steel tip respectively to 3 mm depth. The teeth in control group were not treated. Microcracks, marginal integrity and gutta-percha clearance were observated under SEM. Results: Diamond ultrasonic tips provoked a smaller number of cracks(P = 0. 059) and destroy of margin- al integrity(P = 0.269) than stainless steel tips. Less gutta-percha clearance was produced by stainless steel tip than that by diamond ultrasonic tip(P = 0. 006). Conclusion: Diamond ultrasonic tip is more suitable for root-end preparation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7