澳大利亚刑事推定证据规则适用研究  

Study on Application of Evidence Rules in Criminal Area in Australia

作　　者：胡印富[1] David Field 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120 [2]澳大利亚邦德大学法学院

出　　处：《河北法学》2015年第4期105-114,共10页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：澳大利亚刑事诉讼证据规则中,刑事推定包括事实推定与法律推定,法律推定之中又涵盖可反驳的法律推定与不可反驳的法律推定。为了让证据在控辩双方中充分博弈使其越辩越明,刑事推定中的多数推定都是可反驳的推定,不可反驳的法律推定类型往往很少且逐渐成文化。可反驳的(事实与法律)推定之间常常存有冲突,各种可反驳的证据之间并无优劣顺序之分,解决冲突的路径则交由控辩双方的证明责任,法官依举证责任的分配来确定采取哪方证据。Australian evidence law, criminal presumptions include presumptions of fact and presumptions of law. Presumptions of law includes rebuttable and irrebuttable presumptions of law. The significant majority of presumptions in crime are rebuttable presumptions. Irrebuttable presumptions are very few and now almost all of them have been provided in statutes. Rebuttable of presumptions of fact and law may be perceived to conflict. There is no importance ranking among all of those types of presumptions. In reality, the Court does not directly give their preference to particular presumptions. Rather they try to resolve the burden of proof. So once one party relies on a rebuttable p party needs to show evidence to rebut it. Failure to rebut losing the action. The party failing to discharge his or he the action. problem by allocating resumption, then the other does not r burden necessarily mean of proof will lose

关 键 词：事实推定 法律推定 举证责任 自由裁量权 证明力 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]