检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柳玉晓[1] 刘桂才[2] 朱国雄[1] 刘彦普[2]
机构地区:[1]济南军区总医院口腔科,山东济南250031 [2]第四军医大学口腔医学院颌面外科
出 处:《口腔医学研究》2015年第3期230-233,共4页Journal of Oral Science Research
摘 要:目的:探讨放射照射后牵张成骨过程中下牙槽神经的电生理变化。方法:12只中国杂种犬随机分为A、B、C三组,A、B、C组为实验组,每组4只,单侧下颌A组接受总剂量22.8Gy,5.7Gy/4次/2周(相当于50Gy/25次/5周),B组接受总剂量24.8Gy,6.2Gy/4次/2周(相当于60Gy/30次/6周),C组接受总剂量27.2Gy,6.8Gy/4次/2周(相当于70Gy/35次/7周)的60 Co放射照射。放射照射完成后3个月时,各组分别于照射区下颌骨切开,置入牵张器。经五天延迟期,以0.5mm/次,2次/d的速度牵张下颌骨10d,然后固定8周。分别于放疗前、放疗结束后、牵张前、牵张第6天、牵张完成即时、固定第2,4,8周8个时间点以神经电生理检诊仪测定神经电生理变化。结果:50Gy和60Gy组牵张过程中动作电位呈现适应性变化,70Gy组不能完整导出动作电位。结论:低剂量放射照射不会单独对牵张过程中神经电生理变化造成影响,高剂量放射照射不能完成电生理检查。Objective: To explore the electrophysiological changes of IAN during DO after irradiation. Methods: 12 Chinese dogs were randomly divided into 3 groups--GroupA,B, C. Each group owned 4 dogs individually. GroupA received a unilateral irradiation from 60Co in the mandible with a total dose of 22.8Gy in four 5.7Gy fractions (e- quivalent to 50Gy/25 fractions) within two weeks. GroupB receieved a unilateral irradiation from 6o Co in the mandi- ble with a total dose of 24. 8Gy in four 6. 2Gy fractions (equivalent to 60Gy/30 fractions) within two weeks. GroupC receieved a unilateral irradiation from 60Co in the mandible with a total dose of 27.2Gy in four 6.8Gy frac- tions (equivalent to 70Gy/35 fractions) within two weeks. Bilateral coticotomy was made 3 months after completion of irradiation. After a 1--week latency period bone distraction was activated at a rate of 0.5mm twice daily for 10 days, followed by a consolidation phase of 8 weeks. During the experiment,8 time--points was chosed to examine, record and analyze the evoked potentials(EP) of IAN : pre-- irradiation, post-- irradiation, pre-- distraction, the sixth day amid distraction, post--distraction, the 2th, 4th, 8th week during consolidation. The neural electricity tester was used to each group to carry out the electrophysiologic analysis. Results: The action potential(AP) of IAN showed corresponding change during the irradiation and distraction process in groupA and B,but groupC did not got integrated AP. Conclusion: Low dose irradiation cannot influence the electrophysiologic change of the IAN during DO while high dose irradiation can severely influence it.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117