两种工学结合高职护理教育环境的比较与分析  

Measure and analysis on higher vocational nursing education environment in two kinds of Work-Study Combination

作　　者：王珊珊[1] 白威[1] 连剑娟[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建卫生职业技术学院护理系,福州市350101

出　　处：《中国护理管理》2015年第3期323-326,共4页Chinese Nursing Management

基　　金：福建省教育厅研究项目(JB12304)

摘　　要：目的:比较和分析两种工学结合高职护生成长的教育环境的优劣。方法:采用教育环境测量工具(DREEM)对两种常见的工学结合教育环境进行现况调查并分析。结果:护生对两种教育环境的总体评价很满意,且二者差异无统计学意义。在教育环境的5个维度中,护生对学习知觉和教师知觉2个维度的评价为好,对其他3个维度的评价为较好;在教师知觉、社交知觉、环境知觉3个维度上,护生对2种教育环境的评价差异无统计学意义;在学习知觉和学术知觉2个维度上,护生对2种教育环境的评价差异有统计学意义,引企入校模式学习知觉维度的测量值较高,办校入企模式学术知觉维度的测量值较高。结论:两种工学结合的教育环境都有利于学生的成长,二者之间虽没有差异,但各有千秋,可以相互借鉴。Objective： To build better education environment for higher vocational nursing students. Methods： Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure（DREEM） was used to evaluate the vocational nursing education environment under two kinds of work-study combination. Results： The nursing students were satisfied with both education environments, and there were no significant differences between them. The nursing students showed the most satisfactory to two subscales, which included perceptions of learning and teachers. They felt moderately satisfactory with the other three subscales. There were no significant differences on three subscales, including teachers＇, environmental and social self-perceptions, but there were significant differences on the other two dimensions. The score of learning was higher in the school class environment, while the score of students＇ academic self-perceptions was higher in clinical class environment. Conclusion： The two kinds of education environment were both benefit for nursing students development, but each had its own merits, and they could profit from each other.

关 键 词：教育环境 测量 工学结合 高职 护理 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]