检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁曼容[1]
机构地区:[1]东北师范大学历史文化学院
出 处:《古代文明》2015年第2期91-104,114,共14页The Journal of Ancient Civilizations
摘 要:中华书局点校本《明史》为诸本明史中最佳版本,然而由于《明史》卷帙浩繁,点校本中仍有一些错讹。其中的《诸王世表》是研究明代藩王的基础文献之一,有必要对其再做校订,以求信实。本文使用多种明史版本及稿本进行校勘,对于记载不同处又分别用《明实录》、王世贞《弇山堂别集》等重要明代史籍查证。通过校订,发现其中可加正误及缺失可补漏者49则,其中4则内各含2条错讹之处。The Ming History punctuated and collated by Zhonghua Book Company is the best version until now. However, because The Ming History is a multivolume, there are still some errors in this version. The Chronology of Princes compiled in The Ming History is one of the basis literature which can be used to study the princes in the Ming Dynasty, so it is necessary to collate it again. This article used 5 kinds of versions about The Ming History for collation, and used The Memoir of Ming Dynasty and Yan Shan Tang Anthology and other important historical records in Ming Dynasty to do the textual criticism. There are 49 items with 52 errors in this article.
关 键 词:中华书局点校本《明史》 《明史·诸王世表》 正误
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166