论《唐才子传校笺》的校笺方法及方法论意义  

Discussion on Revision and Annotation of Tang Scholars and Its Methodology

作　　者：唐萌[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学文学院

出　　处：《文学与文化》2015年第1期118-123,共6页Literature and Culture Studies

摘　　要：元人辛文房撰《唐才子传》作为中国文学史上第一部唐代诗人传记专书,其传文内容疏误颇多。由傅璇琮主编的《唐才子传校笺》对其进行了正错讹、理疑乱、补漏落的校笺工作,整理出一部足资考鉴的唐代诗人传记,并建立了"校考笺"一体的校笺模式,开创了"传证体"这一传记新体例,凸显了"探源溯流"的考据思想。其中所用校笺方法是校笺者个性化学术思维的反映,为后来学者提供了有形的师法途径,具有开示门径的意义。Biographies of Tang Scholars written by Xin Wenfang of the Yuan dynasty is the first biography of Tang poets in Chinese literary history, which unfortunately contains some mistakes in it. Fu Xuancong, editor-in-chief of Revision and Annotation of Tang Scholars, corrected the mistakes and added the missing parts, making it a better reference for biographies of Tang poets. Fu Xuancong set up a model for proofreading, textual criticism and annotation, and created a new style of biographical research. All these display the research ideology of tracing the original sources. The applied methods of revision and annotation reflect the academic ideology of individuals, and provide specific techniques for the scholars later generations.

关 键 词：《唐才子传校笺》 校笺方法 方法论 

分 类 号：I207.5[文学—中国文学]