检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余开亮[1]
出 处:《烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年第2期16-22,共7页Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
摘 要:维特根斯坦的"家族相似性"理论对当代艺术哲学论争产生了深刻影响,它直接催生了当代分析美学关于如何对艺术进行归类的三种解决方案。新维特根斯坦主义将其发展到了艺术分析领域,用"家族相似性"来归类艺术,提出了反本质主义的艺术识别观;新本质主义在曼德鲍姆对"家族相似性"理论的批判基础上,重新找到了对艺术本质追寻的新路径;而作为本质怀疑论者的卡罗尔则在批判完"家族相似性"概念后,提出了另一种历史性叙事的新的艺术识别观。The theory of family resemblances provided by Ludwig Wittgenstein had a deep effect on the debate on contemporary philosophy of art,and it brought on three methods for classifying art in contemporary analytic aesthetics. Neo- Wittgensteinians applied the theory of family resemblances to classify art,and suggested an idea of identifying art by canceling artistic essence. On the basis of critical thought of Maurice Mandelbaum about the theory of family resemblances,Neo- essentialism found a new approach to artistic essence. As a skeptic about essence,Carroll criticized the concept of family resemblances,and proposed a different way of identifying art by historical narratives.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49