美国确认竞合权利诉讼制度及其对我国的启示  

A Study on the Interpleader Within the American Law and Its Significance to PRC

作　　者：郭萍[1] 李晓枫[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院,辽宁大连116026

出　　处：《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第2期62-68,共7页Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：海洋战略创新团队项目成果;中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(3132014313)

摘　　要：确认竞合诉讼制度是英美法系国家的一项特殊的民事诉讼制度,在美国有着尤为发达的司法实践。确认竞合权利诉讼与我国的诉讼第三人制度、听证制度、提存制度、无主财产的公告认领制度、海事强制令制度等都存在差别。在介绍美国法下确认竞合诉讼制度的基础上,分析比较其与我国相似制度的差别,指出我国尚无有效的程序机制能够替代确认竞合权利诉讼的制度功能。我国有必要引入确认竞合诉讼制度,该制度在我国具有可行性。Interpleader,a special civil procedure in common law system,has a long history and outstanding judicial practices in the United States of America. Interpleader has many distinctions with the third party system,hearing system,deposit system,determination of a property as ownerless system,maritime injunction system. Based on the analysis on the interpleader within the American law,this paper compares interpleader with the similar systems of civil procedure law in the People ＇s Republic of China（ PRC）,and points out that there is no civil procedure in PRC law can replace the functions of interpleader. It is necessary and feasible to introduce interpleader to PRC.

关 键 词：确认竞合诉讼制度 美国 民事诉讼法 

分 类 号：D915.185[政治法律—诉讼法学]