中美刑事诉讼法律规模比较研究——从秘密侦查制度切入  

Comparative Study of the Scale of Criminal Procedure Law between China and America:Focusing on the Secret Investigation

作　　者：蔡其颖[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第3期20-26,共7页Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences

摘　　要：制度规模的研究不仅可以体现法律的重视程度、考察体系的完备程度,还有利于把握历史发展态势,检验立法技术水平。就秘密侦查而言,美国联邦层面对乔装型秘密侦查主要通过判例和内部规范来实现规制目的;而对监控型秘密侦查则形成了包括成文法、判例和内部规范在内的较为全面的法律规制体系。我国对秘密侦查的规制长期处于空白状态,直到新刑事诉讼法及其司法解释的出台,才真正将秘密侦查纳入法治化轨道。但是与美国相比,我国对秘密侦查的制度规范在类型规模、规范数量、配套规模等方面有明显不同,立法者的立法技术还处于亟待提升的状态。Study of the scale of legal system can not only reflect the emphasis of legislators,observe the perfection of system development,but also conducive to grasp the historical development trend,inspect legislation technology level.In terms of secret investigation in America,undercover investigation is regulated by case-law as well as internal norms;while covert surveillance is guided by a more comprehensive regulation system,including statute law,precedents,and the internal standard. However,regulation of secret investigation in China remainsto be blank until the new criminal procedural law come out.By compared with America,the scale of secret investigation in China is obviously different.Legislative technique still needs to improve.

关 键 词：制度规模 秘密侦查 类型规模 规范数量 配套规模 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]