检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大同市第二人民医院肿瘤内科,山西大同037005
出 处:《临床医药文献电子杂志》2015年第11期2019-2019,2022,共2页Electronic Journal of Clinical Medical Literature
摘 要:目的:分析比较食管癌单纯调强放疗与同步化疗、序贯化疗的疗效。方法我院对2010年6月-2011年6月在我院住院治疗的156例食道癌患者,A组行调强放疗同期化疗,B组行单纯放疗;C组行序贯放化疗,观察三组局控率及生存率。结果 A组的生存率较B组有显著提高,但局控率没有显著性差异。A组与C组比较,无论是生存率还是局控率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论食管癌同步化疗联合序贯化疗不仅能有效减轻患者痛苦,同时提高患者的生活质量,是一种行之有效的治疗方法,值得在临床上推广应用。Objective To analysis and comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy pure and synchronous chemotherapy, the curative effect of sequential chemotherapy.Methods Our hospital on June 2010 to June 2011 in our hospital treatment of 156 patients with esophageal cancer, intensity modulated radiation therapy group A row over the same period of chemotherapy, radiotherapy alone; group B Group C line sequential chemoradiation, observe three groups of local control rate and survival rate.Results The survival rate in group A than group B had significantly improved, but there is no significant difference between local control rate. Group A compared with group C, both survival and local control rate differences were not significant (P〉0.05). Conclusion Esophageal synchronous chemotherapy combined sequential chemotherapy not only can effectively relieve patients' pain and improve the life quality of patients at the same time, it is an effective treatment method, is worth popularization and application in clinic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15