检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽铜陵市人民医院神经内科,铜陵244009 [2]安徽医科大学第一附属医院神经内科
出 处:《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2015年第3期227-229,共3页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基 金:安徽省教育厅自然基金重点项目(KJ2012A175)
摘 要:目的 探讨成人癫痫患者社会支持、生态学执行功能特点以及两者的相关性.方法 应用社会支持评定量表(SSRS)和执行功能行为评定量表成人自评问卷(BRIEF-A)对65例癫痫患者和60例性别、年龄、受教育程度等与之匹配的正常成人进行社会支持和生态学执行功能评定,采用独立样本t检验、Pearson相关性分析和多元逐步回归分析对数据进行统计分析.结果 (1)癫痫组SSRS总分、主观支持、客观支持及支持利用度[分别为(37.01±6.74)分、(19.51±4.77)分、(7.18±2.73)分、(7.45±1.75)分]均低于对照组[分别为(40.89±8.54)分、(23.52±2.85)分、(11.02±2.43)分、(9.55±2.88)分],BRIEF总分及行为管理指数、元认知指数两个维度得分[分别为(55.12± 10.49)分、(53.74± 10.35)分、(56.60±10.99)分]均明显高于对照组[分别为(48.10±6.3)分、(47.18±5.84)分、(48.16±6.23)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).(2)相关性分析显示:SSRS总分、主观支持、客观支持及支持利用度与BRIEF总分、元认知指数及行为管理指数均呈显著负相关(P<0.01).发作类型及SSRS总分与BRIEF总分显著相关(P<0.01).结论 癫痫患者缺乏社会支持,存在生态学执行功能障碍;社会支持缺乏与患者生态学执行功能障碍显著相关.Objective To explore the social support and characteristics of ecological executive function in adult patients with epilepsy,and their correlation.Methods Evaluate the social support and ecological executive function in 65 cases of adult epilepsy patients and 60 normal ones of the same gender,age group and educational level using the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-adult version (BRIEF-A).The date were statistically analyzed with independent sample t test,Pearson correlation analysis and multiple stepwise regression analysis.Results The scores of adult epilepsy patients in global executive composite,subjective support,objective support and support utilization of SSRS(respectively,37.01±6.74,19.51 ± ±4.77,7.18±2.73,7.45± 1.75) were lower than those of the control group(respectively,40.89±8.54,23.52±2.85,11.02±2.43,9.55±2.88).The scores of adult epilepsy patients in global executive composite (GEC),behavioral regulation index(BRI) and metacognition index(MI) of BRIEF(respectively,55.12± 10.49,53.74± 10.35,56.60± 10.99) were significantly higher than those of the control group (respectively,48.10± 6.3,47.18± 5.84,48.16± 6.23) (P〈0.01).SSRS scores,subjective support,objective support and support utilization were obviously negative to BRIEF scores,behavioral regulation index (BRI) and metacognition index (MI) (P〈 0.01).Seizure type and SSRS scores were closely related to BRIEF (P〈0.01).Conclusion The epilepsy patients show a lack of social support and ecological executive function dysfunction.The lack of social support is significantly related with ecological executive dysfunction.
分 类 号:R742.1[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.106