检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学文学院,100872
出 处:《语言教学与研究》2015年第3期79-86,共8页Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies
摘 要:"可以说"和"应该说"是现代汉语中两个常用的固定结构。本文尝试从情态的角度出发,分析两者表义的共性与差异。我们认为"可以说"和"应该说"已经词汇化,可以看作是表认识情态的副词,这是二者的共性。受词汇化前"可以"和"应该"表义差异的影响,二者的意义差别体现在推断依据、情态强度两个方面。Keyishuo(可以说) and yinggaishuo(应该说) are two common fixed phrases in modern Chinese. This paper tries to analyze their eommonalities and differences in the view of modality. It is held that they both have lexicalized and should be seen as epistemic adverbs. Their differences are embodied in the basis of deduction and the degree of modal strength, which are caused by the discrepancy of keyi and yinggai before the lexicalization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28