建构主义国际规范演进研究述评  

A Review on Evolutionary Constructivist Studies of International Norms

作　　者：陈拯[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院,讲师。200030

出　　处：《国际政治研究》2015年第1期135-153,共19页The Journal of International Studies

基　　金：上海市哲学社会科学规划青年课题"中国参与国际人道主义干预规范塑造的对策研究"(课题批准号2013EGJ001);上海市教委2013年度"晨光计划"项目"国际人道主义干预规范变迁机制与中国对策研究"(13CG14);"上海交通大学文科科研创新基金青年项目"(项目号:12QN13)的支持

摘　　要：主流建构主义的国际规范研究正在经历从"规范扩散"到"规范变动"的议程转变。在学派间范式辩论的背景下,相关研究从一开始便聚焦国际规范的传播与影响,展示体系规范对国家的社会化作用。学者们细致讨论了社会化与规范传播的过程机制与条件变量,并延伸到"反向"的规范退化问题。这些研究展示了单一规范的演进过程,通过扎实的经验研究确立了建构主义理论的学术地位。同时,社会化议程也日渐暴露出结构思维的僵化弊端及忽略规范自身变动等缺陷。为此,学者们正在进行一系列新探索,提出了实践转向、双向社会化等新思路,试图在强调规范进程复杂性与多元行为体参与的基础上,更加系统地研讨规范自身演进的机理。Mainstream constructivist studies of international norms are undergoing an agenda shift from 'norm diffusion'to 'norm change. 'In the context of inter-paradigm debate,earlier studies of international norms focused on the diffusion and influence of norms in order to demonstrate the socialization effects of systemic norms on states. Previous studies explored the key variables and causal mechanisms of norm diffusion and socialization as well as the reverse question of norm degeneration. Those rigorous empirical works demonstrated the evolutionary process of norms and established a solid academic status for constructivism. Meanwhile,the study of socialization has the problem of static thinking and neglects the issue of norm change. In order to address those deficiencies,some scholars proposed the 'practice'turn,two-way socialization,and some other new approaches in order to highlight the complexity of norm evolution characterized by the participation of plural actors and to explore the mechanisms of norm evolution more systematically.

关 键 词：国际政治理论 建构主义 国际规范 

分 类 号：D80[政治法律—政治学]