检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田学和[1]
机构地区:[1]北京教育考试院
出 处:《中国考试》2015年第4期3-7,共5页journal of China Examinations
摘 要:国务院《关于深化考试招生制度改革的实施意见》颁布后,亟需设计高考成绩组成方式。本文通过对国内高考成绩各种组成方式的比较,指出影响高考成绩组成方式的因素,并归纳出高考成绩组成为并列式和相加式。提出新一轮高考改革成绩组成方式的选择既要与考试招生制度改革的总体目标一致,也要顾及中学、大学和社会三方面的要求,还要避免制度惯性的影响。通过对并列式和相加式成绩组成方式的比较,得出并列式优于相加式的结论。As the State Council of the People' s Republic of China issued the Advice on the Reform of Exa.mination and Enrollment System, it is an urgent time to design the new scoring system for the College Entrance Examination. This paper points out the factors that affect the mode by comparing the scoring systems in several pilot provinces, and sums up in two scoring modes, the score-paralleling and the score-adding. The paper puts forward that the choice of the scoring mode not only adheres to the overall goals of the examination and enrollment system reform but also takes the requirements of high schools, colleges and the society into account. At the same time the influence of the systemic inertia should be avoided. At the end of this paper, a further comparison of the score-paralleling and the score-adding is made, and a conclusion is drawn. It is that the former system is better than the latter.
关 键 词:考试招生制度改革 高考 高中学业水平考试 计分方式
分 类 号:G405[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145