检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东财经大学法学院,广东广州510320 [2]华南理工大学法学院,广东广州510006
出 处:《铁道警察学院学报》2015年第2期58-64,共7页Journal of Railway Police College
摘 要:"劳教"废止后我国的法律处罚制度需重新建构。主张借鉴国外及港澳台的经验,将"劳教"的调整对象上下靠,分别由下位的治安处罚和上位的刑事司法来承接的意见具有可行性。据此,应在现行《刑法》中植入重罪轻罪分层和保安处分的制度,同时构建相应的简易速裁、轻刑缓押、社区矫正、前科否定等配套机制,用法律真实和程序正义来实现行政处罚与刑事处罚的无缝对接。After reeducation through labor being abolished, the legal punishment system needs to be reconstructed. This paper proposes to take for reference the experience from abroad and that from Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, and divide the objects of reeducation through labor into two groups: the group in the lower position can be accepted by criminal justice; the group in the upper position can be accepted by public security penalties. Accordingly, the system of the division of felonies and misdemeanors and security measures should be added to the current Criminal Law. Meanwhile, the corresponding systems, such as simple rapid judgment, slow charge for light punishment, community correction, denial of criminal record, etc., should be established so as to link the executive punishment and criminal punishment completely through legal truth and procedural justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222