检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]唐山市人民医院,河北063001
出 处:《医学动物防制》2015年第5期558-559,561,共3页Journal of Medical Pest Control
摘 要:目的探讨持续质量改进对急诊科医院感染控制的效果。方法选择2012年急诊科院感监测结果为对照组、2013年持续质量改进后院感监测结果为观察组,两组进行比较,对比指标包括:院感知识的掌握、制度的落实、无菌物品和消毒液的正确使用、抗生素的合理应用,以及环境空气、医护人员手、仪器物品表面的细菌菌落数和院感发生率。结果观察组在院感知识的掌握、无菌物品和消毒液的正确使用方面优于对照组;环境空气、医护人员手和仪器物品表面细菌菌落数、院感发生率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论持续质量改进对急诊科医院感染控制是有效的,能降低感染的发生率。Objective To explore the effect of continuous quality improvement of emergency department in hospi- tal infection control. Methods The monitoring results of hospital infection control were choose as control group and observation group respectively in 2012 and 2013. The hospital infection knowledge awareness, the imple- mentation of institution, the correct using of sterile articles and disinfectant, the reasonable application of anti- biotics, the CFU of ambient air, hands of medical staff and equipment items, and the incidence of nosocomial infection were compared between the 2 groups. Results The hospital infection knowledge awareness and the correct using of sterile articles and disinfectant in the observation group were both superior to those in the con- trol group ( p 〈 0.05 ) . The CFU of ambient air, hands of medical staff and equipment items, the incidence of nosocomial infection in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (p 〈0. 05) . Conclusions quality improvement of emergency department in hospital infection control is effective, the incidence of nos- ocomial infection can be deduced.
分 类 号:R197.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145