论行政执法证据在刑事诉讼中的使用——以道路交通违法行为为视角  

On the Use of Administrative Law Enforcement Evidence in Criminal Litigation:In View of Road Traffic Offence

作　　者：万尚庆[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学法学院,安徽芜湖241003

出　　处：《法学杂志》2015年第5期111-119,共9页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：安徽省哲学社会科学规划一般项目"道路交通事故认定研究"(项目批准号:AHSKY2014D07);安徽师范大学哲学社会科学繁荣发展计划首批重点项目"社会风险中的公共安全治理研究"(项目批准号:FRZD201305)的阶段性研究成果之一

摘　　要：研究行政执法证据在刑事诉讼中的使用,是完善行政执法与刑事司法衔接机制的的重要方面。我国《刑事诉讼法》第52条第2款规定的"可以作为证据使用"是指行政执法证据具有进入刑事诉讼领域的资格,无需刑事侦查机关再次履行取证手续。"等证据材料"的范围既包括实物证据,也包括言词证据,凡是不能在刑事诉讼中重新收集、调取的行政执法证据,都可以在刑事诉讼中作为证据使用。在刑事诉讼中,司法机关应从真实性、关联性和合法性三个方面对行政执法证据进行审查。Studying the use of administrative law enforcement evidence in criminal litigation is to improve the convergence mechanism of administrative law enforcement and criminal justice. ＂Can be used as evidence＂ as prescribed in Paragraph 2, Article 52, Criminal Procedure Law refers to the use of administrative law enforcement evidence in criminal litigation without the evidence collection procedures of the criminal investigation organs. ＂The evidence materials＂ include physical evidence and verbal evidence. The administrative law enforcement evidence that cannot be collected and retrieved in the criminal lawsuit can be used as evidence in criminal proceedings. In the criminal proceedings, the judicial organs should review the administrative law enforcement evidence from three aspects, namely, authenticity, relevance and legitimacy of the evidence.

关 键 词：行政执法证据 刑事诉讼 使用 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]