检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨红[1] 刘建兴[2] 周泽平[1] 刘琳[1] 张铀[1]
机构地区:[1]昆明医科大学第二附属医院血液科,云南昆明650101 [2]昆明医科大学,云南昆明650101
出 处:《中国实验血液学杂志》2015年第2期328-334,共7页Journal of Experimental Hematology
基 金:云南省应用基础研究计划项目-联合专项(2011FB198)
摘 要:目的:比较应用SCID和NOD/SCID小鼠构建急性髓系白血病模型成瘤率的不同。方法:分别给SCID和NOD/SCID小鼠腹腔注射HL-60细胞,观察小鼠的一般情况、应用流式细胞术检测骨髓细胞CD33阳性率,病理学检查鉴定动物模型。结果:应用SCID小鼠构建急性髓系白血病模型成瘤率为30%,而应用NOD/SCID小鼠构建急性髓细胞白血病模型成瘤率为100%。结论:接种HL-60的NOD/SCID小鼠相对于SCID小鼠成瘤率高,小鼠发病率稳定,更适宜应用于白血病机制研究。Objective :To compare the tumor-forming rate between the SCID and NOD/SCID mice to set up acute myeloid leukemia (AML) mouse model. Methods:The SCID and NOD/SCID mice were injected with HL-60 cells in to the abdominal cavity in order to contruct the AML mouse model. The gereral status of mice was observed, the positive rate of CD33 in bone marrow ceils was detected by flow cytometry, the mouse model was identified by pathologic examination. Results:The tumor-forming rate in constructed model using SCID mouse was 30%, while the tumor-forming rate in constructed model using NOD/SCID mouse was 100%. Conclusion:Compared with SCID mice, the tumor-forming rate in NOD/SCID mice injected with HL-60 cells is high, the incidence of AML is stable, suggesting that the NOD/SCID mouse model is more suitable to explore the pathogenesis of leukemia.
关 键 词:急性髓细胞白血病 SCID小鼠 NOD/SCID小鼠
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.71