反讽叙事、德里达与《雪》之论争  

The Narrative of Irony,Derrida and the Debate about Snow

作　　者：张虎[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏师范大学文学院

出　　处：《江苏开放大学学报》2015年第2期59-64,共6页Journal of Jiangsu Radio & Television University

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"帕慕克与苏菲神秘主义思想研究"(13CWW011)

摘　　要：奥尔罕·帕慕克的《雪》是一部备受争议的小说,曾引起本土民族主义者的集体焚烧。这其中是否掺杂着一些误读的部分?实际上,《雪》的内容可以分成前景、背景两部分,前景是一元论叙事,背景是互文性叙事,两者构成一种文本反讽效果。这种反讽在土耳其本土、东西方文化冲突、形而上哲学三个层面展开。最终,通过反思人与雪花的生命构成,帕慕克表征了一种德里达式的延异诗学——"每个人都有一片代表自己生命的雪花"。Snow by Orhan Pamuk is a controversial novel and had once been collectively burned by Turkish nationalists. Does it mix with any misreading？ Actually ,Snow can be divided into two parts of foreground and background. The narrative of the foreground is monism,while the background is intertextuality. These two aspects form a textual effect of irony, which spreads on three aspects as Turkey,the cultural clash between East and West, and metaphysics. Finally, Pamuk represents a differance poetics of Derrida by reflecting the life compositions of human and snowflake- ＂everyone has his own snowflake＂.

关 键 词：帕慕克 《雪》 反讽 延异 

分 类 号：I374.074[文学—其他各国文学]