检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学人文学院,陕西西安710049 [2]第四军医大学护理学院,陕西西安710032 [3]西安工程大学思政部,陕西西安710048
出 处:《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年第3期35-40,共6页Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基 金:陕西省社会科学基金资助项目(13C008);陕西省国际合作项目(2011KW-35)
摘 要:当代中国以"公益民生"为本位的"幸福中国"执政理念和诉求愿景,要求人们在学理上先行厘定或澄明"道德—幸福—社会结构"的关系问题。当代中国"富裕社会"的幸福观建构,理当基于"价值理性之限度"立场并面向"新伦理本体境界"的体验发生。对幸福满意度或幸福指数的厘定,须臾也不能脱离道德与社会结构的双向调适,只是后者(指社会结构)的调适更具有基础地位或者在逻辑上优先于前者。The governing philosophy and the wishful vision of Happiness China is based on the concept of pub- lic welfare and People's Livelihood in contemporary China, which requires us to doctrinally determine or clari- fy the relationship between morality, happiness and social structure as a priority. The establishment of the view of happiness in terms of affluent society in contemporary China should be based on the limits to value rationality and developed with orientation to the perception of new ethics noumenon realm. Meanwhile, the determination of satisfaction degree or happiness index should be bi - directionally regulated by both morality and the social structure; however, the latter is much more basic or logically prioritized to the former when it comes to the functions of adaptation to happiness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.14