检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘贤军[1] 王银光[1] 黄启龙[1] 汪易易[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民银行聊城市中心支行,山东聊城253000
出 处:《金融发展研究》2015年第4期66-70,共5页Journal Of Financial Development Research
摘 要:交往主体作为"经济人",在市场的博弈过程中,追逐自身利益最大化是个体理性的选择,但在日常经济活动中,个体理性往往导致集体非理性结局。本文运用哈贝马斯的"交往理性"理论剖析了山东省聊城市东海铸锻破产案,在政府主导或外部力量适度干预下,通过谈判磋商,最终促进多家银行与企业达到交往理性的均衡状态,并据此提出了相关风险处置的顶层设计。Communication subjects as the economic man chase benefits maximization,which are the choice of in-dividual rationality. While individual rationality is always not achieved instead of communicative rationality finally. In this paper,Habermas theory of communicative rationality and the bankrupt case of Donghai cast in Liaocheng are com-bined to analyze. It describes how individual rationality reaches equilibrium of communicative rationality, and then points that government leading or moderate intervention of external forces are helpful to reduce the prisoner’s dilemma through consultations,so as to realize the optimal allocation of social resources. At last,it puts forward a new idea of top-level design for reducing credit risk fundamentally.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38