再辩“怠于行政职责论”——就环境公益诉讼原告资格与曹树青先生商榷  

Reargument on the Theory of Indolence in Administrative Duty——Discuss with Mr.Cao Shu-qing on the plaintiff qualification of the environmental public interest litigation

作　　者：谢玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东海洋大学法学院,广东湛江524088

出　　处：《河北法学》2015年第5期123-132,共10页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金项目<生态利益衡平的法制保障研究>(12BFX120);广东省高校优秀创新人才培育项目<广东海洋外来物种入侵现状及立法研究>(wym11091)

摘　　要：环境公益诉讼制度的功能定位是对行政管理权的补充而非替代,寄希望通过赋予环保行政部门公益诉讼原告资格以应对环境管理公权力的不足是公益诉讼制度不能承受之重。环境公益诉讼的本质属性、制度生成背景和民主价值取向内在预设了环境公益诉讼的当然主体为公民个人和环保团体。唯有将公民个人和环保团体作为基本主体的制度设计才能实现环境公益诉讼制度的理性回归。The function orientation of environmental public interest litigation system is the supplement of the administrative power rather than an alternative ; hope through giving the administrative department of environmental protection of plaintiff qualification in public interest litigation with inadequate response to the environmental management of public power is the public interest litigation system can＇t bear the heavy. The intrinsic attributes, the system development background and democratic value orientation of environmental public interest litigation presupposes the environmental public interest litigation of course subject for individual citizens and environmental groups. Only the system design of taking individual citizens and environmental groups as the basic subject of the implementation can achieve the rational regression of the environmental public interest litigation system

关 键 词：环境公益 环境公益诉讼 原告资格 行政职责 制度功能 

分 类 号：DF74[政治法律—诉讼法学]