检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈翠婷[1] 邹菡[1] 肖峰[1] 孙文娟[1] 吴坚[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第三医院口腔科,广州510600
出 处:《中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版)》2015年第2期31-34,共4页Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition)
摘 要:目的研究行为认知六步法(cognitive behavioral six-step method)是否更有利于促进社区人群口腔保健行为的改善,从而更有利于社区人群牙周病的防治。方法于2014年3月随机抽样获取广州天河石牌社区人群中社区牙周指数(CPI)符合3区段的50人,随机分配进入干预组和对照组,每组25人。干预组人群进行行为认知六步法干预,对照组人群只接受传统的口腔卫生宣教。干预组和对照组人群干预前、干预后1个月、干预3个月分别检查龈沟出血指数(SBI)、菌斑指数(PI)、牙周探诊深度(PD),并进行特定任务自我效检量表(SESS)评分。结果干预组人群接受行为认知六步法干预后1个月、干预后3个月的PI、SBI、刷牙自我效检均得到明显的改善,且与对照组相比,差异均具有统计学意义(PI:1个月,t=-8.73,P=0.001;3个月,t=-7.88,P=0.001;SBI:1个月,t=-7.71,P=0.001;3个月,t=-5.00,P=0.001;刷牙自我效检:1个月,t=10.36,P=0.001;3个月,t=10.27,P=0.001)。而PD改善不明显,差异无统计学意义(1个月,t=-1.87,P=0.068;3个月,t=-1.26,P=0.094)。结论与传统口腔卫生宣教相比,行为认知六步法能更好地改善社区人群的口腔保健行为,从而利于促进社区人群的牙周病防治。Objective To explore the effect of cognitive behavioral six-step method on the improvement of the oral health behavior and the periodontal disease control of community people.Methods Fifty people selected form community population with CPI code 3 were randomly assigned into the intervention and control groups. People in the intervention group were received six-step behavioral cognitive intervention, while people in the control group were given traditional oral hygiene instruction. Periodontal changes including plaque index(PI), sulcus bleeding index(SBI) and probing depth(PD) as well as the scores of task-specific self-efficacy scale for self-care(SESS) were evaluated respectively at three observation points(before intervention as the baseline, 1 month and 3 months after intervention). Results The scores of PI, SBI and brushing self-efficacy at 1 month and 3 months were improved significantly after intervention for both groups, and the intervention group demonstrated significantly greater outcomes compared with the control group(PI: 1 month, t =-8.73, P = 0.001;3 months, t =-7.88, P = 0.001;SBI: 1 month, t =-7.71, P = 0.001; 3 months, t =-5.00, P = 0.001;brushing self-efficacy : 1 month, t = 10.36, P = 0.001; 3 months, t = 10.27, P = 0.001). However, no significant difference in PD was shown between intervention and control groups at all three observation points(1 month, t =-1.87, P = 0.068; 3 months, t =-1.26, P = 0.094). Conclusion Comparing with the traditional oral hygiene education, cognitive behavioral six-step method demonstrates a superior promoting in the oral health behavior and periodontal disease prevention of community population.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.51.7