检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜远[1] 徐小童[1] 王莹[1] 朱春燕[2] 孔晓明[1] 吴晓平[1] 王玉梅[1] 陈龙[1] 张许来[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽省精神卫生中心(合肥市第四人民医院)老年心理科,合肥230022 [2]安徽医科大学应用心理学系,合肥230032
出 处:《安徽医科大学学报》2015年第5期661-664,共4页Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
基 金:合肥市科技局立项项目(编号:合科[2010]160);国家自然科学基金青年基金(编号:31100812)
摘 要:目的探讨系统多元化平衡运动对阿尔茨海默病患者认知功能的影响。方法入组阿尔茨海默病(AD)样本(n=50)分为干预组(n=24)和对照组(n=26)。干预项目分为同时提高平衡、正性认知能力,参加者每周训练3次,每一阶段1 h,共24周,对照组在相同时间内不参加任何训练。检查认知功能用蒙特利尔认知评定量表、画钟实验、Be Hery正性评定量表、符号寻找子测验。机体体能用定时上下试验:30秒的坐下和起立实验,坐下和指鼻实验,Berg功能平衡量表。结果干预组在正性认知功能中有了显著的提高(P<0.01),在蒙特利尔认知评估中,干预组得分更高(P<0.01),尤其在注意、定向、抽象思维能力及语言表达方面改善明显。在画钟实验方面也较对照组有明显提高(P<0.01)。干预组在平衡控制方面表现失衡减少,而对照组表现失衡增加,两组间干预前后比较,干预组出现失衡概率明显减少(P=0.04)。结论与对照组相比,受干预者认知功能改善,具有更好的身体平衡能力和更强的体能。Objective To explore the effects of a systematized multimodal exercise intervention program on frontal cognitive function of individuals with Alzheimers Disease (AD). Methods Samples of older adults with AD (n =50) were assigned to a training (n = 24) and a control (n = 26) group. The intervention program was evaluated with the degree of simultaneously promoting better balance and frontal cognitive capacity. The participants received an 1-hour session three times a week for 24 weeks, whereas the control group did not participate in any activity dur-ing the same period. Frontal cognitive function was assessed by using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MCoA), the Frontal Assessment Battery(FAB), Clock Drawing Test (CDT) and the Symbol Search Subtest. Functional ca-pacity components were analyzed by using the Timed Up and Go Test, the 30-second sit-to-stand test, the sit-and-reach test, and the Berg Functional Balance Scale. Results Intervention group participants showed a significant increase in frontal cognitive function in MCoA (P 〈 0. 01), intervention group participants got more scores, espe-cially improvement in attention, orientation abstraction and language expression, intervention group participants showed a significant increase in CDT as well. Intervention group participants showed less body sway in postural bal-ance, however, controls showed more body sway. The intervention group participants’ imbalance chance decreased significantly, comparing with the two groups before and after intervention (P = 0. 04). Conclusion Intervention participants have better postural balance and greater functional capacity than the controls.
分 类 号:R749.1[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学] R875[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7