青少年生活事件量表效度与信度的再评价及常模更新  

Validity and reliability of the Adolescent Self-rating Life Events Checklist in middle school students

作　　者：辛秀红[1,2] 姚树桥[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理学研究所,长沙410011 [2]宁夏医科大学临床医学院医学心理学系,银川750004

出　　处：《中国心理卫生杂志》2015年第5期355-360,共6页Chinese Mental Health Journal

基　　金：国家科技支撑计划项目(2009BAI77B02)

摘　　要：目的:重新探索并验证青少年生活事件量表(ASLEC)的结构,检验其信度,并制定该量表在中学生群体中的常模。方法:采用分层随机整群抽样对来自全国10个城市,10 566名中学生进行生活事件自我评定(填写ASLEC);同时选取流调中心抑郁量表(CES-D)、儿童多维焦虑量表(MASC)作为效标评定抑郁症状出现频度和焦虑状况与生活事件的相关性。间隔4周后,随机选取141名被试以检验问卷的重测信度。结果:探索性因子分析结果表明ASLEC包括受惩罚、丧失、人际压力、学习压力和适应问题5个因子。验证性因子分析各拟合指标为RMSEA=0.10,CFI=0.90,TLI=0.88,WRMR=4.96。量表总分与CES-D、MASC总分的相关系数分别为0.45和0.43。量表的Cronbachα系数为0.92,重测信度为0.73,分半信度为0.85。量表总分较刘贤臣等人1997年研究中总分明显下降。各因子分除丧失因子外其余在性别上均有差异,男生在受惩罚、适应因子上高于女生,在人际压力因子与学习压力因子上低于女生。结论:新的五因子结构得到验证,量表具有较好的效度和信度。研究提供的总分及因子分常模可以为今后的研究提供参考。Objective：To re-explore and confirm the construct of the Adolescent Self-rating Life Events Checklist （ASLEC）,and evaluation the reliability of it among middle school students. Methods：Totally 10 566 ad-olescents,grade 7th to grade 12th,from 10 cities were recruited to complete ASLEC by using stratified randomized cluster-sampling method. The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale （CES-D ）,Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children （MASC）were selected as the criterion measurements which to examine the association between depression and anxiety with life events. Test-retest reliability were examined by 141 participants random se-lected after 4 weeks. Results：ASLEC including being punished,loss,relationship pressure,learning pressure and a-daption problem after explored factor analysis. The fit indices of confirmatory factor analysis were RMSEA=0. 10, CFI=0. 90,TLI=0. 88,WRMR=4. 96. The correlation coefficients of total scale with ASLEC and total score with CES-D and MASC were 0. 45 and 0. 43. The Cronbach＇sαcoefficient of the total scale was 0. 92,the test-retest re-liability was 0. 73,the split-half reliability was 0. 85. The total score decreased apparently compared with the norm of Liu＇s study （in 1997）. Compared to girls,there were significant higher score on punishment and adaption sub-scale,and significant lower score on relationship and learning pressure subscale among boys except the loss factor. Conclusion：A more reasonable new construct consists of 5 factors has been confirmed. The ASLEC has good validity and reliability. The score on total scale and subscales in this study can serve as norm references.

关 键 词：青少年生活事件量表 效度 信度 心理测量学 

分 类 号：B841.7[哲学宗教—基础心理学] B844.2[哲学宗教—心理学]