正性负性信息注意量表中文版测试大学生样本的效度和信度  

Validity and reliability of the Chinese Attention to Positive and Negative Inventory in college students

作　　者：戴琴[1,2] 冯正直[1] 许爽[1] 谢钧润[1] 刘可愚[1] 于永菊[1] 王晓霞[1] 张睿[1] 贺英[1] 李嘉雯[1] 李静[1] 刘云波[1] 刘秀娜[2] 张翠华[2] 王立菲[1] 杨晓霞[2] 高秋平[2] 韩在玲 

机构地区：[1]重庆市第三军医大学医学心理系,重庆400038 [2]重庆市第三军医大学护理系,重庆400038

出　　处：《中国心理卫生杂志》2015年第5期395-400,共6页Chinese Mental Health Journal

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(NSFC:31200774)

摘　　要：目的:引进正性负性信息注意量表(APNI),并在大学生样本中检验其效度和信度,为国内研究者提供一个便捷可靠的认知偏向测评工具。方法:对APNI英文版进行翻译、回译、再翻译和修订。选取两个样本共1450名大学生进行施测,样本1(n=1000)用于条目分析、探索性因子分析、效标效度及信度分析,样本2(n=450)用于验证性因子分析;在样本1中随机选取68名大学生间隔1周进行重测。用贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)和病人健康问卷(PHQ-9)检验效标效度。结果:条目分析显示APNI中文版的22个条目具有良好的区分度。探索性因子分析显示量表包含正性信息注意和负性信息注意两个因子;验证性因子分析显示量表具有良好的拟合指标(χ2=1376,RMESA=0.09,CFI=0.94);BDI-II、PHQ-9总分均与API得分呈负相关(r=-0.24、-0.29,均P<0.01),而与ANI得分均呈正相关(r=0.36、0.31,均P<0.01)。APNI两个分量表的内部一致性α系数分别为0.86和0.82,重测信度分别为0.79和0.62。结论:正性负性信息注意量表中文版在大学生样本中具有良好的效度和信度,可以用来评估我国大学生群体的认知偏向特点。Objective：To translate the Attention to Positive and Negative Inventory（APNI）and analyze the validity and reliability in Chinese undergraduates sample,to offer a convenient and reliable tool of measuring the cognitive bias for national researchers. Methods：The English-version APNI went through translation into Chinese, retroversion into English,translation into Chinese again,and revision several stages. Two parts of samples （1450 Chinese college students）were surveyed. Sample one （n=1000）was used for item analysis,exploratory factor a-nalysis （EFA）,concurrent validity and reliability analysis,while sample 2 （n=450）was used for confirmatory fac-tor analysis （CFA）. Totally 68 subjects of sample 1 were randomly chosen and resurveyed with an interval of one week. Beck depression inventory （BDI-II）and patient health questionnaire （PHQ-9）was used for concurrent validi-ty. Results：Item analysis indicated that the 22 items of Chinese APNI had good discriminability. EFA focused on＂attention to positive information＂（API）and ＂attention to negative information＂（ANI）two factors. CFA showed good model fit （χ^2 =1376,RMESA=0. 09,CFI=0. 94）. Concurrent validity result showed that the total scores of BDI-II and PHQ-9 was negatively correlated with total scores of API （r=-0. 24,-0. 29,Ps〈0. 01 ）,and posi-tively correlated with total scores of ANI （r=0. 36,0. 31,Ps〈0. 01）. The Cronbach＇αcoefficients of API and ANI sub-scale were 0. 86 and 0. 82,while the retest reliability coefficients were 0. 79 and 0. 62. Conclusion：It suggests that the Chinese APNI has good validity and reliability in a sample of college students,which could be used to eval-uate the cognitive bias of Chinese college students.

关 键 词：正性负性信息注意量表 效度 信度 心理测量学 

分 类 号：B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学] B841.7[哲学宗教—心理学]