出 处:《中国医药》2015年第6期854-858,共5页China Medicine
摘 要:目的 探讨腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术治疗老年进展期胃癌的远期临床效果及对血清肿瘤标志物和高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)的影响.方法 选取2008年8月至2012年6月四川省崇州市人民医院诊治的86例进展期胃癌患者,根据手术疗式不同分为腹腔镜组(43例)和传统开腹组(43例),比较2种手术方式的近远期临床效果及血清肿瘤标志物,包括癌胚抗原(CEA)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、细胞角蛋白21-1片段(CYFRA21-1)、糖类抗原125(CA125)、糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9),hs-CRP及凝血功能指标的变化情况.结果 腹腔镜组与传统开腹组手术时间和淋巴结清扫数目比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而出血量[(89±19)ml比(122±25) ml]、止痛剂使用次数[(0.68±0.28)次比(2.19±0.53)次]、胃肠道恢复时间[(2.6±0.4)d比(4.0±0.5)d]、住院时间[(9.1±1.8)d比(12.6±2.4)d]和不良反应发生率[14.0% (6/43)比39.5% (17/43)]比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),均为腹腔镜组优于传统开腹组.腹腔镜组患者中位总生存期(OS)为10.2个月(95% CI:8.211-13.089),传统开腹组患者为9.7个月(95% CI:5.804- 10.596),组间差异无统计学意义(x2=3.481,P=0.062).手术前2组患者的CEA、NSE、CYFRA21-1、CA125、CA19-9,hs-CRP和凝血功能凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、纤维蛋白原(FIB)、凝血酶时间比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),但手术后各项指标均有所改善,而且腹腔镜组患者的降低幅度均明显高于传统开腹组[CEA:(10.1±2.6) μg/L比(18.8±5.2) μg/L;NSE:(14±3) μg/L比(22±7)μg/L;CA125:(31±7)kU/L比(45±7) kU/L;CA19-9:(28±7)kU/L比(47±17)kU/L和hs-CRP:(2.3±0.7) mg/L比(2.9±0.9)mg/L] (P<0.05).结论 腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术对老年进展期胃癌有良好的临床效果,并且能明显�Objective To investigate the long-term clinical efficiency of laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer and the effects on the serum tumor markers and high sensitive C reactive protein (hs-CRP) in elderly patients.Methods Totally 86 elderly patients of advanced gastric cancer from August 2008 to June 2012 were enrolled and divided into laparoscopic group (43 cases) and laparotomy group (43 cases).The long-term therapeutic efficiency was evaluated.The levels of serum tumor markers including carcino embryonic antigen (CEA),neuron-specific enolase (NSE),cytokeratin fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1) carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9),hs-CRP,blood coagulation index before and after operation were measured and compared between two groups.Results The operation time and the number of dissected lymph node showed no significant difference between two groups (P 〉 0.05);bleeding,using times of analgesic,gastrointestinal recovery time,hospitalization time and incidence of adverse reactions in laparoscopic group were significantly lower than those in traditional laparotomy group [(89 ±19) mlvs (122±25) ml,(0.68 ±0.28) timesvs (2.19 ±0.53) times,(2.6 ±0.4) d vs (3.9 ±0.5) d,(9.1 ±1.8) d vs (12.6 ±2.4) d,14.0% (6/43) vs 39.5% (17/43),P〈0.05];overall survival of laparoscopic group and laparotomy group had no significant difference [10.2 months (95% CI:8.211-13.089) and 9.7 months (95% CI:5.804-10.596) (x2 =3.481,P =0.062).The serum tumor markers,coagulation indices and hs-CRP showed no significant differences between two groups before operation (P 〉 0.05);they were all improved after operation.The levels of CEA,NSE,CA125,CA19-9 and hs-CRP in laparoscopic group were all significantly lower compared with those in laparotomy group after operation [(10.1 ± 2.6) μg/L vs (18.8 ±5.2) μg/L,(14±3) μg/L vs (22±7) μg/L,(31 ±7�
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...