我国民事诉讼答辩失权制度的建立  

The Establishment of the System of Civil Defense Invalidity in China

作　　者：赵婷[1] 

机构地区：[1]太原科技大学法学院,山西太原030024

出　　处：《山西农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第5期523-526,共4页Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：被告不提交答辩状会导致以下弊端:原告和被告的诉讼权利不平等;被告恶意滥用答辩权;影响证据交换制度的实施。我国的民事诉讼法和相关的司法解释都没有规定不提交答辩状的法律后果,因而无法有效解决上述弊端。为解决这一问题,许多国家建立了答辩失权制度。有必要借鉴国外的经验来构建我国的答辩失权制度。The defendant＇s not submitting the answer will lead to the following drawbacks： the unequal litigation rights of plaintiff and the defendant; the defendant＇s abuse of the right of reply; affecting the implementation of evidence exchange system. China＇s civil procedure law and relevant judicial interpretations do not prescribe legal consequences of not submitting the answer, which cannot effectively solve these drawbacks. A lot of countries have set up the system of answer irritancy to solve this problem. Learning from foreign experience is necessary to construct the system of answer irritancy in China.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 答辩状 失权 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]