检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:亢晶晶[1]
出 处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2015年第3期73-81,共9页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
摘 要:协同主义诉讼模式是民事诉讼中的一个重要理论,将其导入到刑事诉讼中有利于审辩之间从对立走向一定程度的协作,实现辩护权对裁判权的制约,逐步实现"庭审中心主义"和"审判中心主义",发挥审判守护公正的作用,防范冤假错案的发生。虽然将协同主义诉讼模式导入刑事诉讼还面临一些障碍,但不能从根本上阻碍其的导入。在协同的路径选择上,控审之间和审辩之间应采用不同模式,控审协同受审辩协同的制约,审辩协同处于中心地位。The cooperation pattern of litigation is an important theory in civil procedure, the introduction of which will definitely make the trial and the defense cooperate in a certain degree. The cooperation pattern of litigation contributes to the restriction of jurisdiction, the realization of the target of "trial center" and the role of guarantee justice, thus prevent the mistrials to the maximum extent. Although the introduction of the cooperation pattern of litigation to criminal procedure still faces some difficulties, these factors can not hinder the introduction. For the choice of specific path, the prosecution and the trial should adopt a mode different from those of the trial and the defense, between which the former is restricted by the later, and the cooperation between them is in the center position.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38