检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学图书馆
出 处:《图书馆论坛》2015年第6期21-29,共9页Library Tribune
摘 要:《图书馆员及其他信息工作者的伦理准则(IFLA)》研究既是理论问题,又是实践问题。理论上存在研究视角不够宏观、深度广度不够、问题意识不强的问题,造成研究与图书馆实际脱离。实践上,图书馆所处社会环境、社会结构、馆员价值观突变,有些馆员违背《准则》,出现馆员道德困境。提出《准则》是一种行业自律,也是一种社会规范、一种制度和一种技术手段;《准则》应有指导性和可操作性,有明确的职业道德范畴界定,有针对性和前瞻性。The study on Code of Ethics for Librarians and Information Workers is not only a theoretical issue, but also a practical issue. In theory, the research on the Code has its limitations: lack of macro perspective, depth and breadth, and lack of problem consciousness, which take the research out of the context. In practice, with the changes of social environment, social structure and librarian values, librarians encounter ethical dilemmas and do something against the Code. Therefore, the study of the Code should be continued and deepened. The Code is a kind of self-discipline, social norms, system and technological means. The Code should be instructive, operable, targeted and prospective, ethical category should be defined clearly. The content and five shortages of the Code are analyzed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249