检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王莉[1] 曲建升[1,2,3] 刘莉娜[1] 边悦
机构地区:[1]兰州大学西部环境教育部重点实验室/干旱环境与气候变化协同创新中心,兰州730000 [2]中国科学院资源环境科学信息中心 [3]国家科学图书馆兰州分馆,兰州730000
出 处:《干旱区资源与环境》2015年第5期6-11,共6页Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
基 金:中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA05140100);国家自然科学基金(41371537)资助
摘 要:基于IPCC表观消费量法和投入产出法,测算1995-2011年我国城乡居民家庭碳排放量,在此基础上对城乡家庭碳排放进行比较。结果表明:城乡家庭碳排放总量差距不断扩大,而人均差距减小;城镇逐渐以间接排放为主,农村仍以直接排放为主;城镇煤炭排放比重下降迅速,农村煤炭排放比重仍较大;收入提高使排放结构发生变化,城镇增幅最大的为交通通讯排放,农村为居住排放;人均家庭碳排放的城乡差异方面,东部发达省区较小,西部欠发达省区较大。Based on IPCC apparent consumption method and input- output model,this study estimated the household carbon emissions of urban and rural areas of China from 1995 to 2011. On this basis,urban and rural household carbon emissions were compared. Results show that the household carbon emissions gap between urban and rural was widening,but per capita emission gap decreased; indirect carbon emissions were priority gradually in urban areas,while rural still given priority to direct carbon emissions; the proportion of coal emissions fell considerably for urban,but it was still large for rural. With the income increasing,the biggest increase of carbon emissions occurred in transportation and communication industries for urban,and the dwelling for rural. Urban-rural disparity of per capital household carbon emissions in eastern provinces was smaller than that in southwest provinces.
分 类 号:X24[环境科学与工程—环境科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117