检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈超
机构地区:[1]中国应用法学研究所博士后工作站,北京100062
出 处:《河南财经政法大学学报》2015年第3期65-73,共9页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"社会转型中的刑事司法改革与制度创新研究"结项成果之一(项目编号:10BFX039)
摘 要:意大利在司法改革中确立了多元化的刑事特别程序。但是,立法突进引起"文本法律"与"实践法律"冲突:司法适用率低、被告人权利保障不力、诉讼周期依旧漫长等一系列问题。意大利对刑事特别程序不断修正,平衡个人权利和限制国家权力,形成了独具特色的权利主导型模式:一方面赋予被告人更多程序权利,限制国家权力;另一方面保留部分职权主义传统,赋予法官更多程序审查权和检察官更大司法权力。我国刑事司法也存在人权保障和司法效率问题,意大利刑事特别程序的权利模式对我国刑事司法改革颇有启示。In order to protect the rights of the accused and to enhance the efficiency of the proceedings, Italy established the criminal special procedures. Italy was the first European country in civil law system which intro- duced the consultative justice. As the legislative onrush is contrary to their traditional legal culture, there are difficulties in the Initial implementation of the Italian criminal especial procedure. For example, low utilization rate of the judiciary, litigation is still very long, rights of the accused can not be guaranteed. The Italian crimi- nal special procedures continue to change, struggle to balance the rights and power relations:on the one hand, giving the defendant more procedural rights,limiting the power of the States ; on the other hand, sticking to the bottom line of justice, giving judges more power to review the program. After constantly revised, especially Ital- ian criminal procedure gradually achieve the legislative purposes. After constantly revised, Italian criminal es- pecial procedure gradually achieve the legislative purpose. On the protection of the rights and cost savings, the experiences and lessons of the Italian criminal special procedures give us a lot of enlightenments.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38