检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柳岳武[1]
出 处:《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第2期41-47,共7页Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"清代藩属体制研究"(项目编号:10CZS019);中国博士后科学基金第53批面上资助项目"清代中国边疆危机及应对研究"(项目编号:2013M531662)
摘 要:1792年中尼战争与马戛尔尼使团访华失败,两者之间是否存在必然联系,一直是中西方纠缠不清的问题。西方不少人认为,它是导致使团访华失败的主要原因。中方亦有学者持类似观点。检阅相关史料档案后,研究发现,两者之间虽有关联,却无直接关系。东西方体制差异、欠缺了解和互相猜忌,无疑成为导致使团访华失败的致命因素。Whether there exists an inevitable link between the China-Nepal war in 1792 and the failure of the George Macartney diplomatic corps to China has always been a tangled historic issue to both Chinese and western scholars. Although many of them believe in its existence, the author argues that there is no direct link between them; in fact, it was the Qing court's suspicions as well as its intention to restrict the British colonial expansion in the Orient that led to the corps' failure. But the British colonial authorities had a guilty conscience which caused them to think the corps' failure was mainly due to the war and Fukangan distorting whistle-blowing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117